Author |
Message |
George
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:55 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:05 pm
Posts: 51
|
I have 2 identical boxes, one is mine and the other a friends. They have a PVR-250, 7N1F2 MB and Athlon processor. They also have a homemade IRblaster running off COM1 controlling a DISH receiver. Both were running R5D1. I did an upgrade of mine to R5F27 and after following the tips it works fine. My friend didn't care about saving anything so I did a fresh install on his.
I was able to configure the inputs and mythfilldatabase ran successfully. I can control the box using the keyboard. It doesn't respond to the Hauppauge silver remote. IRW doesn't show any activity. I am using my IR dongle and remote.
I ran lirc-reconfig.sh and picked the silver remote.
I looked at various posts and collected info and it seems to agree with working installations:
/etc/lirc/hardware.conf seems OK:
Code: root@mythtv:/etc/lirc# cat hardware.conf # /etc/lirc/hardware.conf # # Arguments which will be used when launching lircd LIRCD_ARGS=""
#Don't start lircmd even if there seems to be a good config file START_LIRCMD=false
#Try to load appropriate kernel modules LOAD_MODULES=true
# Run "lircd --driver=help" for a list of supported drivers. DRIVER="default" # If DEVICE is set to /dev/lirc and devfs is in use /dev/lirc/0 will be # automatically used instead DEVICE="/dev/lirc0" MODULES="lirc_dev lirc_i2c"
lirc devices Code: root@mythtv:/dev# ls -al /dev/lirc* crw-rw---- 1 root video 61, 0 Oct 3 13:21 /dev/lirc0 crw-rw---- 1 root video 61, 1 Oct 3 13:21 /dev/lirc1 srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Oct 3 13:21 /dev/lircd
lirc processes: Code: root@mythtv:/dev# pgrep -fl lirc 2908 lirc_dev 2911 /usr/sbin/lircd --driver=default --device=/dev/lirc0
Code: root@mythtv:/dev# lsmod |grep lirc lirc_serial 16128 0 lirc_i2c 12420 2 lirc_dev 16772 2 lirc_serial,lirc_i2c i2c_core 20864 22 nvidia,lirc_i2c,i2c_ec,cx88_vp3054_i2c,cx88xx,saa7134_dvb,saa7134, ir_kbd_i2c,tda1004x,dvb_bt8xx,bttv,ivtv,saa7115,msp3400,tuner,tea5767, tda8290,tuner_simple,mt20xx,i2c_algo_bit,tveeprom,i2c_nforce2
Any suggestions appreciated.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
slowtolearn
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:37 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 1381
Location:
Farmington, MI USA
|
Is your COM port enabled in the BIOS? What does Code: dmesg | grep ttyS show you?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
George
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:10 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:05 pm
Posts: 51
|
slowtolearn wrote: Is your COM port enabled in the BIOS? What does Code: dmesg | grep ttyS show you? Thanks for your suggestion. I don't think this would be a COM port issue but I don't have a clue what to look at. The IR dongle is a receiver and plugs into the PVR-250 . Here are the COM ports it shows: Code: root@mythtv:~# dmesg | grep ttyS serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A serial8250: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A 00:0a: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A 00:0b: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
|
|
Top |
|
 |
slowtolearn
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:37 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 1381
Location:
Farmington, MI USA
|
George wrote: Thanks for your suggestion. I don't think this would be a COM port issue but I don't have a clue what to look at. The IR dongle is a receiver and plugs into the PVR-250. Ahh, I thought George wrote: I have 2 identical boxes, one is mine and the other a friends. They have a PVR-250, 7N1F2 MB and Athlon processor. They also have a homemade IRblaster running off COM1 controlling a DISH receiver meant you were using the IRBlaster with the remote. Missed the "IR dongle and remote" part.
Are you sure the dongle is plugged in all the way? I have had problems with the jack not seating properly.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
George
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:57 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:05 pm
Posts: 51
|
slowtolearn wrote: Are you sure the dongle is plugged in all the way? I have had problems with the jack not seating properly.
Yes, reinserted it a few times.
I just did a test that proves the hardware is OK. I pulled the HD from mine and put it in my friends box. It sees the Hauppauge remote.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
tjc
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:42 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location:
Arlington, MA
|
See the R5F27 Hints. Known Issue #5.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
George
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:22 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:05 pm
Posts: 51
|
tjc wrote: See the R5F27 Hints. Known Issue #5.
Thanks,
I checked if the driver was used and then deleted it on mine and then on my friends box. The loaded module you see in my first post was before I deleted it.
I encountered the sluggish response on mine but the Hauppauge remote doesn't work at all on my friend's box.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
marc.aronson
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:30 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:07 am
Posts: 1532
Location:
California
|
I would try re-running lirc-reconfig.sh just to make sure that you configured the correct remote...
Marc
|
|
Top |
|
 |
George
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:00 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:05 pm
Posts: 51
|
marc.aronson wrote: I would try re-running lirc-reconfig.sh just to make sure that you configured the correct remote...
Marc
I did that a number of times with no difference.
I just did the following:
fresh install of R5F27, ran lirc-reconfig.sh and it still doesn't see the remote.
Figured since I did a R5D1 install last year on the box with no issues I would try that and upgrade if it works. The R5D1 CD was bad so I installed R5E50, ran lirc-reconfig.sh and it doesn't see the remote.
If I swap my working R5F27 HD into the box everything works fine including the remote.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
marc.aronson
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:59 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:07 am
Posts: 1532
Location:
California
|
I don't know what's going wrong, but if I understanding correctly, when you move the hard drive over from the "good" machine where the remote works to the "problematic" machine, everything works fine on the "problematic" machine. Do I have this right? If so, I see two potential approaches that could get things up a running:
1. Make an image copy of the "good drive" to the drive that belongs in the "problematic" machine.
2. Alternatively, move the "problematic" machine's HD to the "good" machine, do a fresh install of R5F27 on the "good": machine, confirm that it works on the "good" machine, and then move it over to the "problematic" machine.
Given the facts you've outlined, I would think that either approach would get you to something that works, although neither approach identifies the root-cause of the problem...
Marc
|
|
Top |
|
 |
marc.aronson
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:01 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:07 am
Posts: 1532
Location:
California
|
A follow-up to my previous post. If you want to continue pursuing the root-cause of the problem, I would look at the contents of /var/log/messages and /var/log/kern.log after a reboot. Look for any messages that might give a clue...
Marc
|
|
Top |
|
 |
George
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:47 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:05 pm
Posts: 51
|
marc.aronson wrote: I don't know what's going wrong, but if I understanding correctly, when you move the hard drive over from the "good" machine where the remote works to the "problematic" machine, everything works fine on the "problematic" machine. Do I have this right? If so, I see two potential approaches that could get things up a running:
1. Make an image copy of the "good drive" to the drive that belongs in the "problematic" machine.
2. Alternatively, move the "problematic" machine's HD to the "good" machine, do a fresh install of R5F27 on the "good": machine, confirm that it works on the "good" machine, and then move it over to the "problematic" machine. Marc
Yes, you are correct. I was thinking of doing an image but here is what I just did and everything seems to be working OK. I downloaded R5D1 and installed it. The remote worked. Then I did an auto upgrade to R5F27. I don't understand why that works because it asks you to configure the remote. Maybe something that gets restored from the backup is correct?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
marc.aronson
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:56 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:07 am
Posts: 1532
Location:
California
|
I'm glad to hear that it is working. It is difficult to say for sure why the autoupgrade from r5d1 worked. As you sugggest, it may have something to do with a restored configuration file.
It dawns on me that a useful experiment would have been to run irw to see if the signals were getting through, but now that you're running, it's probably academic...
Marc
|
|
Top |
|
 |
George
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:10 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:05 pm
Posts: 51
|
marc.aronson wrote: I'm glad to hear that it is working. It is difficult to say for sure why the autoupgrade from r5d1 worked. As you sugggest, it may have something to do with a restored configuration file.
It dawns on me that a useful experiment would have been to run irw to see if the signals were getting through, but now that you're running, it's probably academic...
Marc
I had a dim memory about reading about irw and then rediscovered it when I started poking at the problem. It didn't show any activity when I ran it.
|
|
Top |
|
 |