LinHES Forums
http://forums.linhes.org/

Pentium 2.66 Dual Core or Celeron 3.33
http://forums.linhes.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16091
Page 1 of 1

Author:  gatorback [ Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Pentium 2.66 Dual Core or Celeron 3.33

I have a micro ATX case and looking for a mobo \ CPU combo. That being said I found a 2.66 GHz Dual Core Pentium at roughly the same price as a Celeron 3.33 GHz combo. I am wondering if I am better off with the a faster CPU or a slower dual core processor. I am also wondering if the VIA chipset will hose me over.

I have two of these micro-ATX cases, so I will initially use the first assemble machine as a combo front \ back end machine. Any guidance for making decisions is appreciated as well as any links to an inexpensive CPU mobo combo.

GRACIAS!

Author:  cecil [ Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

I'd recommend the Pentium D.

Author:  gatorback [ Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:20 am ]
Post subject: 

Thanks for the recommendation.

If one of the senior members ,like TJC or Cecil, were to comment on the chipset quiestion, that would help me out. I think I know the answer, however, I would feel better if the more experienced members commented.

Author:  Krem1120 [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

Take the Duel Core, for me its no brainer if the price is the same. Dual Core is basicly like having a two processors.. so while the actualy speed might be a bit slower.. cpu tasks (processes) can run in parallel (at the same time)..... so the actual time it takes to complete multiple taks (instructions) is faster.

The following visualization might help.. but keep in mind a cpu scheduler works differently then shown.. but the concept I am trying to show still applies.

Visually:

Dual Co: < -- Process 1 AND Process 2 -->
Celeron: < ---- Process 1 ----> < ---- Process 2 ---->
Time: 0..........1x..........2x..........3x..........4x..........5x

Get it?

-Mike

Author:  gatorback [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:48 pm ]
Post subject: 

Sounds like the dual core is preferable: that assumes that the KM's algorithms can be run in parallel. Can anybody confirm that this is the case?

Author:  cecil [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 3:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

I'd not have recommended it, if it wasn't supported.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/