View unanswered posts    View active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next

Print view Previous topic   Next topic  
Author Message
Search for:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:37 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: Whittier, Ca
http://www.linux.com/feature/118668

I've replied...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:02 pm 
Offline
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:55 pm
Posts: 1206
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Be sure you don't criticize the "review". I did and my commentary was erased in less than 20 minutes. This shows the true evil side of blogs. They control everything on their site. I suppose we could start a thread here, but good luck getting a link to it on his blog.

_________________
Do you code to live, or live to code?
Search LinHES forum through Google


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:16 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 2:12 pm
Posts: 152
Location: Raleigh, NC
I agree with you, his article was written from the point of view where he chose MythDora and then decided to talk about the others just to mention them. It was a good introduction to the different distributions out there, but really didn't shed any light on what the real benefits or detriments were (other than mythbuntu being a little tough to install). He also left out LinuxMCE (which seams to be gaining some ground).

I use Knoppmyth and will continue to do what I can to support it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:46 pm 
Offline
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:17 am
Posts: 359
The whole review was a little light...

I don't think there was a compelling argument for any of the distros there. You can't see the advantages to ANY distro (myth or regular) until you get into the nuts and bolts. and even then the "Advantages" are mostly how well a given distro fits your preferences. His bit about see which security model fits your prefs touches on this idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:01 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
I even noticed a factual error. KM comes with MythTV 0.20.1-fixes as of changelist 13420, which is newer than the 0.20.1 release by 2 weeks, not "an older version of 0.20"...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:32 pm 
Offline
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:55 pm
Posts: 3161
Location: Warwick, RI
Hi,

I had to add a couple of cents also. Will check later to see if it is still there :)

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:19 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:37 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: Whittier, Ca
Thanks for the support everyone. Pity some of the comments got deleted. I'd love to have read them. While KnoppMyth may have some flaws, to say it doesn't compared especial when you don't know all of the capabilities is crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:01 pm 
Offline
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:55 pm
Posts: 3161
Location: Warwick, RI
Hi,

My post went away also.. but I think to run anything on "old" computers as he mentioned left me wondering how to ever make an old slow machine like I use work when they don't even have a dvd to install it. :)

Anyway, KM has been all I have needed for quite sometime although, I do miss my openoffice. The open minded folks will make their own choice.

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:21 pm 
Offline
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 9:18 pm
Posts: 1422
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
I posted a comment this morning and have already gotten a reply, gee the author is touchy. Here is what I said and the response.
Quote:
Nathan, I have to agree with the anonymous poster in that you have not done KnoppMyth justice at all. Your review was not objective and did not clearly state what the objectives that were to be achieved and did not state how each distro met/do not meet those stated objectives. Your criticism of the anonymous writer are unfounded, you have not properly done your research and your have factual errors in your story. KnoppMyth whilst originally based on Knoppix when installed becomes a Debian system which if you didn't already know is the underlying system behind Ubuntu. The community development behind KnoppMyth is considerable, how many PCs can you buy with MythDora or Mythbuntu preinstalled? How often are releases, how are they maintained, what hardware do they work on, what community support is available? There are all questions that are not in your review and your lack of openness for feedback is disheartening. Girkers

And the reply:
Quote:
Actually, no. I gave each distro equal time and equal space. I began and ended the review explicitly stating that my conclusions were mine and were a matter of what met my needs the best. I neither discouraged anyone from trying any of the distros reviewed, nor said any of them was unworthy. I state the good things I found about all three distros, and I state the shortcomings I found in all three distros. That is what objectivity is. It is not an attack on KnoppMyth nor an attack on MythBuntu when I say that if I were building my box today, I would do it with MythDora. I think it's sad that so many people associated with KnoppMyth seem to think that it is.

Every reader and every MythTV user has complete freedom to decide which criteria are important to them ... as is written in the article. But just because you disagree with the conclusion does not mean you have been misused and abused. Use different criteria if you want, and come to a different decision if you want. In fact, come to the comment section and promote KnoppMyth all you want. But if all you're going to do is accuse everyone who disagrees with you of blindness and stupidity, don't expect much response.

Nate


And my final response posted just now:
Quote:
At no stage did I accuse you of blindness or stupidity, I simply stated that you have factual errors in your story. Here is one or two for you. Quote: "it comes with a slightly older version of MythTV -- a patched version of 0.20 -- and is available through BitTorrent as a 584MB ISO" You are wrong when you stated it only comes with a patched version of 0.20 of MythTV, and is available from a number of mirrors as well as BitTorrent. I could go on but I won't waste my breathe, also I fear that my comments may be deleted as other have been. - Girkers.

_________________
Girkers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:37 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: Whittier, Ca
Guess he doesn't like the heat... Perhaps next time he'll stay out of the kitchen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:19 pm 
Offline
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Philadelphia, PA US
Honestly, I think you guys are being too harsh on the reviewer. I can see many positive things all 3 distros can take from the review.

1st There are the differences in a Fedora, Debian, or Ubuntu. So right off the bat there is a strong possibility to lean based on reviewers' past experiences with Fedora, Debian, or Ubuntu. The same will hold true for differences in package managers in each distro, aptititude, yum, or Synaptic.

2nd The guy took time to write the review. How many of us have tried MythDora or MythBuntu and did any of us then take the time to write a review? There are a bunch of Linux news and magazine sites that would like to have such a review handed to them. Personally I played with MythDora and have some thoughts on it, but this reviewer gets a star because he took the extra time to document and provide his thoughts and ideas to all 3 projects.

3rd All 3 of these projects are OpenSouce, if MythDora is doing a task well why can't MythBuntu or KnoppMyth look into using a similar method? This isn't proprietary software that we can't look what they are doing.
The GPL and Linux are great because they promote and encourage the learning and sharing of ideas/code. This should be a great example, 3 projects 1 goal (bringing MythTV to user), each has strengths and weakness.

Some statements I found of interest things that could be taken away

Quote:
The MythBuntu install started off rocky. The installer misconfigured X by attempting to use the disabled onboard video instead of the attached video card.


This happens on KnoppMyth too, how many posts do we see with "C7 respawn too fast" because xorg is using an integrated i810 video driver rather than a nVidia card. Since apparently MythDora didn't have the issue, how do they overcome? I've noticed on MythDora's 4.0 installer there is a screen for selecting video driver, including different versions of Nvidia driver.

Quote:
MythDora requires a reboot after initial OS installation; upon restart you must walk through a "first boot" wizard to finalize the OS configuration, covering items like firewall settings, SELinux configuration, and sound card setup. Only after you have done this do you begin setting up your system for MythTV-specific configuration like IR Blaster and remote control devices. You can elect to start the normal MythTV front end automatically, or to start the power-saving alternate MythWelcome front end.


I too found the MythWelcome or MythFrontend a nice choice on the MythDora installer too. I also found the Frontend Only, Backend Only, and Frontend/Backend option during install of MythDora. Would those choices of functionality help the KM installer?

Quote:
Accounts ...


Mythbuntu - user account
MythDora - root, mythtv
KnoppMyth - root, mythtv, user account

Is the 3rd account needed in KM? I personally use it one time to login enable root ssh access (my root password is secure) and then do most functions as MythTV or root from console or ssh.

Quote:
Although the patch levels differ between the distros, all are on equivalent ground when it comes to hardware support


I feel KM is ahead of both in hardware detection.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 3:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 11:40 pm
Posts: 357
Location: Irvine, Ca
Well its my policy that no machine should allow a remote root login - no matter how secure you think the password appears. And since the mythtv account password is "known" it should not be allowed remote login either. That means you really need another account. Unless, of course, you wish to reduce your security.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:37 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: Whittier, Ca
Quote:
For regular system maintenance, KnoppMyth simply isn't in the same ballpark as MythBuntu and MythDora. The live CD heritage of Knoppix means you cannot update individual packages, which is fine if you like that, but for an always-on system like a MythTV back end, I'd prefer flexibility and configurability of a mainline distro.
This is crap, crap, crap, crap. If we were in person, I'd happily use other adjectives. He didn't do this homework as far as I'm concerned. How much system maintenance should you have to do on a PVR? How much system maintenance do you have to do on a KnoppMyth box? I know how much I do. None. And if I did, I can ssh into a machine. I can use webmin. I can take a look at stats using RRD. Can either of the other two do this w/o additional software installation?

Dale and I actually discussed removing the need for the third account some time ago. However we decided to wait until R6. There is nothing stopping someone from changing the password for mythtv. KnoppMyth may not be perfect, but the author gives definite impression by his choice of words. BTW: I'm too busy creating a distro to write articles. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:19 pm 
Offline
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:16 pm
Posts: 508
Location: Ft. Worth TX
cecil wrote:
Quote:
How much system maintenance should you have to do on a PVR? How much system maintenance do you have to do on a KnoppMyth box?
I dust mine off every so often.... :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:13 pm 
Offline
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:55 pm
Posts: 3161
Location: Warwick, RI
Hi,

Quote:
This is crap, crap, crap, crap.

Cecil, please tell us how you REALLY feel :)

Quote:
KnoppMyth may not be perfect,

Nothing man makes is perfect and will always have room for improvement, however KM is very good!

Quote:
the third account

If you were to remove the plain install user account, the second thing I would do is adduser <name> First thing is do the reboot... I grew up on a farm where we didn't have to lock the doors and screw the cellar shut. Now even something so seemingly harmless and isolated as the internet is probably one of the most dangerous areas to go. Fur balls are constantly figuring out ways to hose innocent, trusting people.

The third user allows the shipping of KM in a basically secure setup. When the third user is created that becomes the first block to an outsider as they try and guess the user id, then they have to work on the password.

I would like to see more out of the box security, maybe some iptables that lock out a ssh password failure after the second try (for ~ x number of minutes at least) Maybe include firestarter as an included firewall. It is easy to setup, heck I did it :)

Also, why not make the webserver use https as default? The user could always make it less secure but that would be their responsibility.

As for the review, the sunshine part is KnoppMyth was discused and now more people will know that there is another distro available. I think most folks that travel these back roads are openminded and will most likely at least try it and then can make an intelligent decision on their own. Since the other two require a dvd, KM stands a good chance of being tried first :)

As for maintenance, my vcr requires more work to get just pictures in and out than KM does on a bad day and I do beat on mine pretty hard.

The "c7:" error comes from the last line or so in the inittab where it tries to start the xserver. Since it so well documented, it should take any new person about 2 minutes to fix it (you have 5 before it reties to start xserver) which means you have 3 minutes to go get a beer before you continue the setup.

It took me 3 hours to install LinuxMCE using the 3 cd method on a 3ghz box, which is worse? I can only guess at how long it would take to install on my ol' Dell 400mhz box. And it doesn't even see my 350 card, that means no tv tonight unless I spend 15 minutes and install KM :)

Preaching to the choir again :oops:
Have a great day!
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next



All times are UTC - 6 hours




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Theme Created By ceyhansuyu