View unanswered posts    View active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Print view Previous topic   Next topic  
Author Message
Search for:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:29 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:51 am
Posts: 173
Location: Uniontown, PA
Hey gang,

I recently installed a WD 500GB EIDE drive in this system (my FE box) and noticed that it takes a long time to recognize the IDE drives....and boot up.

Is anyone else having this issue, too?

I previously has an old 40GB drive in it, but I could tell that the bearing was starting to go. :( It would boot almost instantly with that drive installed.

BTW: BIOS version: 0705
There's newer versions out, but it only mentions about new CPU support. Would updating the BIOS help? Any tricks to update the BIOS w/o Windows?

UPDATE 09/28/2007:

READ those HD specifications VERY Carefully! What was causing my problem is that the 500GB WD drive has a jumper setting for 'master,' BUT that is a 'master' setting IF it has an attached slave device, too. When I bought the drive, it was jumpered for Cable Select, so I moved it to the Master setting.

Since the HD was the only device on the IDE cable, the drive was still looking for the slave unit, therefore slowing down the boot process. The MoBo settings were NOT the problem. BY default, if there's only the one HD and no slave, it should not be jumpered at all!

Hopefully this may help someone else out in the future!


Last edited by larrybpsu on Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:33 am, edited 2 times in total.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:59 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
Check the boot order in your BIOS. At a guess it's looking at a bunch of other devices first. You may also want to disable any legacy devices you're not using like game controller ports, parallel ports, ...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:05 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:51 am
Posts: 173
Location: Uniontown, PA
No, HD is setup as first boot device. I change it to CD only when updating.

Edit: No 'unused ports' (serial, parallel) are enabled. I keep my systems pretty streamlined in terms of potential resource usage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:16 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
Is it scanning a bunch of SATA ports or something?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:29 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:51 am
Posts: 173
Location: Uniontown, PA
tjc:

Nothing is different in the BIOS settings from the 40GB drive to the 500GB drive.

I've noticed that with the 500GB drive, it takes about an additional 40-50 seconds to determine the ATA devices, then boot.

I even tried putting the 40 GB drive back in the system, and it boots with no delay at all.

Go Figure. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:19 am 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
Are you using the same IDE cables? Are the drives jumpered the same?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:47 am 
Offline
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:26 pm
Posts: 282
Location: Winnipeg - Canada
Maybe this is what TJC was getting at, but is the old drive old enough that it runs proper on a 40 pin IDE cable, and the new drive requires an 80 pin IDE cable?

_________________
Currently Running:
Too lazy to update this with my current hardware, I'll redo it during my next install =)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:43 am 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
Yes. That and a possible CS/MA/SL mismatch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:41 am 
Offline
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:51 am
Posts: 173
Location: Uniontown, PA
The cable is an 80 lead, with both drives set as Master. The DVD burner is connected to the secondary IDE interface as Master, so no interference there, either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:02 am 
Offline
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:26 pm
Posts: 282
Location: Winnipeg - Canada
What brand are the two HDs? I've run into issues with Western Digital drives being set as master when there is no slave present. I've not noticed slow boots, but I have had situations where the mobo won't even recognize that the drive is present unless I either set it to CS or add another device as a slave.

I'd suggest setting it to CS, or moving the Optical drive from Master Secondary IDE to Slave Primary IDE and see if that makes any difference.

_________________
Currently Running:
Too lazy to update this with my current hardware, I'll redo it during my next install =)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 3:08 am 
Offline
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 464
Location: UK
I've had the same issues as rando before, sometimes there's jumper settings for Master, master (with slave) & master (without slave)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:23 am 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
larrybpsu wrote:
The cable is an 80 lead, with both drives set as Master. The DVD burner is connected to the secondary IDE interface as Master, so no interference there, either.

:shock: You can't set both drives on the same cable as MA!

Search for a thread by me that covers the preferred ways to hook up an IDE drive. Ah, here it is, ASCII art and everything...
http://mysettopbox.tv/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7577&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=ide&start=18


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:50 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:51 am
Posts: 173
Location: Uniontown, PA
tjc wrote:
:shock: You can't set both drives on the same cable as MA!


No. They are on separate cables. HD is master on IDE 1 and DVD burner is master on IDE 2.

I did that thinking that (maybe) I may add another drive and create a LV for more storage space. I've always kept optical drives on the secondary IDE port, just to keep the I/O bottlenecks down.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:53 am 
Offline
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:08 pm
Posts: 561
Location: UK
Have you set the BIOS to have already detected the drives rather than scan on boot up?
On removing the second drive (when powered down, of course :) ), does it boot up at the original speed?

Bruce S.

_________________
Updated 2019/10/26: AthlonII X2 265 Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P
16Gb PC 1866 DDR3, 500GB+2TB+4TB SATA HDD,
SATA DVD-RW Asus DRW-24D5MT , NVIDIA GeForce GT1080
Hauppauage Nova-T 500, Nova-T LinHes R8.6.1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:23 pm 
Offline
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:49 am
Posts: 2
Can't offer any specific help I'm afraid (I'm here to try and understand how to resolve my own problems :) ) but I'm using the same motherboard, and a 500GB Seagate IDE drive without any problems.

The HDD is primary master (using cable select IIRC), and the optical is secondary master. The BIOS is the latest I think...

Is the issue that the HDD isn't powering up fast enough? How quickly is it detected on a warm boot, rather than a cold start? There used to be an issue with Western Digital drives back in my Amiga days (so likely to be old tech 80MB drives!) where the drive took so long to spin up to speed that the Amiga gave up polling the IDE port and decided that there wasn't a drive connected :)


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Theme Created By ceyhansuyu